The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
I agree, in a way, but.... (archive)

[ Follow Ups ] [ 3-series (E46) Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]

Posted by Hmmmm... on April 18, 1999 at 19:55:48:

In Reply to: Worring about 100. on a 32,000 purchace posted by Shame on you on April 18, 1999 at 19:02:53:

Would you be concerned about overpaying by $100.00 for a Big Mac? Of course! But it's the same $100. In other words, $100 is $100, no matter how you save it.

But conversely, you only buy a car once every X years. If you buy a Big Mac (or equal) every week for 3 years and overpay by 75 cents each time, that's over $100. $100 spread over the lifetime of the car isn't a big deal, so overall, I side with the people who say "don't let $100 kill a car deal".

Something else to think about. Let's say a person is about equally attracted to two car. He can get Car A for $35,000 and the dealer is making $1,500. He can get Car B for $31,000 and the dealer won't budge from a profit of $2,500. So, why is it that most people would reject car B? Why so much concern for the bottom line for the dealer and not as much concern for the bottom line for the buyer? Somehow, I think that if a 328i cost only $18,000 but $10,000 of that was dealer profit, there would be no takers. People would go down the street and pay twice as much in order to get that dealer profit down!

Follow Ups:

[ Follow Ups ] [ 3-series (E46) Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk. Logo © 1997 - 2018 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.