|
In Reply to: Re: Rudy, we're buds, but....(m) posted by Rudy on May 08, 2000 at 11:28:33:
now, stick drivers need to get past the notion that they can shift faster than a computer. it's no contest, as any step driver can attest. granted, the GM-built BMW step trans is not the same as what racing teams use, but it's DAMN FAST, especially under spirited acceleration. there is no lag on my car, i can promise you.
it's amazing to be able to have your foot planted on the floor, and click thru the gears within seconds.
so, the most you can look to (imo) is the driveline losses associated w/ step. granted, they are unavoidable, but i'd be willing to bet that most drivers are still faster. racing teams with huge bankrolls are able to develop and use true clutchless direct-drive manuals to make up this difference, but seeing how these F1 and touring car drivers are shifting their cars these days, how can ANYONE think that they are so good that they can shift faster? you guys think you're better than the F1 driver? why don't they use a clutch anymore then?
cmon you guys, you win on the driveline losses, but please, you can't hope to win the "i can shift faster than a computer". please, go drive a step trans.
as far as your CCA training goes rudy, keep in mind that this is the FIRST YEAR the step has been available on the 3-er's, right? revolutionary ideas often take years to filter down and overcome ingrained preconceived notions. look no further than this board for evidence of that. i'll wager a year's pay that within 5 years, more steps will be at those training schools than manuals. mark it down!
© 1997 -
2009
Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.
