The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
Yeah,but your'e comparing a Ci which is naturally (archive)
[ Follow Ups ] [ 3-series (E46) Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Posted by lower compare sedan 2 sedan w/17's(e) on July 03, 2000 at 11:38:59:

In Reply to: Side by side pics of IS300 and 328Ci posted by Paul. on July 02, 2000 at 20:17:11:

: Hope these help some people trying to make a decision. I know they are 2 different cars - 4 dr. vs 2 dr. and Topaz vs Black - on and on.

: Please forgive the image quality. The clouds were not cooperating and I don't take pictures for a living.

: I left the pics a 1280x960 because I thought you may have wanted detail. For some reason the 2 on the lot had 16-inch wheels, but the sticker had 17 inch as std. equipment. There was one in the showroom that had 17 inch rims.

: My take on the car is purely by the looks. I have never been inside one. The IS300 looked small to me. Way smaller than an E46 sedan. The inside looked not as accomadating as my coupe. IMHO, it just looked cheaper. Sorry to the IS300 fans. What struck me was the cheap fuel, and trunk pulls at the bottom of the driver's door. It reminded me of the Toyota's we used to own. (again, nothing against Toyota owners - I have a '93 4-Runner also) The inside seemed really boxy too. *But remember, I am completely biased! hehe

: Let me know what you think of the visual comparison!

: Paul.

:



Follow Ups:


[ Follow Ups ] [ 3-series (E46) Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2008 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.