|
In Reply to: 325 is a better comp to the IS300 than 330 posted by Carmel325 on April 15, 2001 at 21:38:29:
...because you obviously don't work in any of large metropoli that necessitate an automatic. I envy your situation. I just don't envy the apparent fact that you can feel good about paying the same amount of money for:
1. A smaller displacement engine w/no better specific output.
2. A manual transmission w/o any sort of cost savings, since anybody and their mother knows that automatics cost more to produce, and contrary to your apparent belief, do have their uses.
3. A car that is by all accounts (anecdotal and statistical) less dependable and more expensive to repair.
And good luck trying to throttle-steer that low-torque 2.5 liter around a switchback.