In Reply to: Re: I feel Sorry for bigots like you! posted by Scottie on February 03, 2001 at 12:38:58:
I DID NOT forge other people's names in attempts to fraudulently ensdorse a commercial product. Have you not heard of 'hacking' & 'being framed up'? I did not write those things, someone is having a laugh at my expense and thinking it's a big joke to get me banned from 'here'.
It is not my product, I am not affiliated with Ecotek in any manner what-so-ever! I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE WHO WILL ENDORSE IT ON THEIR OWN precisely because it is as good as the company claim, but I don't belong to that company or any motoring company or organisation for that matter.
An internal combustion engine will give very specific power and very specific economy, bearing in mind design factors & the technology of the day (1980's); if you have a designated swept volume, rpm, air flow, fuel rate, and timing setting the mixture needs to be approximately 14.7 to 1 ratio, the ignition timing needs to be carefully controlled over the rev. range, allowing for load factors, and poor quality lower octane unleaded fuel & average driver needs. The average/stock BMW compromises in these areas in an attempt to appeal to as wide a range of purchasers as is possible. It is possible to 'tweak' these settings for more precise economy or more precise acceleration, pulling power etc. Having bought the thing, some will approach a garage to make it run more economically and sacrifice power in the process and vice-versa! i.e. these settings/values are NOT absolute by any means (e.g. Dinan chips changes them!). Likewise, the CB26P changes values too!
Now then, the purpose is NOT as you put it to "create an atmospheric air leak" (nor a lean burn mix!) no! The purpose is infact to create a contolled micro precise injection. This injection in turn produces a turbulent swirl reaction within the air/fuel particle atomisation which results in a much more combustable "soup" in the plenum chamber. When ignited the "soup" is much more 'receptive' (due to the increased
'oscillation' process (descibed above) offering a more complete 'burn' of the mix, in turn producing less toxic emissions, more efficient use of fuel (economy) & a bigger bang (increased BH-Power!). This additional injection of air is so minute/tiny that it can in no way be construde to constitute a large enough 'air-leak' to be considered detrimental to the normal functionality of the (I.C.E.) internal combustion engine; infact it's the opposite i.e. beneficial to the I.C.E. 'Swirl technology' was not available in the Eighties to the mass car manufacturing market so obviously it was not used or 'fitted'. Besides, Ecotek have the CB26P patented & copyrighted in order to prohibit such practices by car makers.
What you (Scottie) don't want the general public to know is that the CB26P does-away with the need for the 'superchip' mentality almost completely. Needless to say that the CB26P is a lot less expensive than any of the superchips resulting in considerable financial gain to the man in the street!
Talking of financial gain by the way (?), as you (Scottie) mention Dinan, Jim C, & Authority, are you certain that you are not financially affiliated to any of them? If sales on the superchips dropped off would you be unduly concerned about having a decreased share/% of the companies revenue in terms of sales or some other vested interest perhaps?
See what I mean (?) you mention Dinan etc & I mention the CB26P. I can just as easily allege that you work for Dinan, consequently you're on 'here' SPAMMING! - Just as you have alleged that I work for Ecotek which is equally as ridiculous!
I'm NO Fool Mr! I re-iterate IT IS NOT MY PRODUCT but that of Ecotek, of which I am no part! I see that you have finally resorted to crued insults because you know you have a WEAK case! Allusions to my posterior will not strengthen your case! Indeed, readers may think less of you and your claims in spite of it!
You know what you can do with your 'permission' don't you?
I won't 'sue' you, but Ecotek may consider it worthwhile?
It is not my policy to engage in street races, thanx-but no thanx! I prefer to use the vehicles power for its intended and more intelligent purposes/pursuits.
The car is fine thank you. It's environmentally friendly (less toxic emissions), more responsive than ever and economical too! thanx to the CB26P which I swear by. How's your own fuel economy these days by the way ?
Or, did I mention a sore point?