How about twin 40 DCOE'S?... (archive)

A 38/38 will work as well as the 32/36. The difference is that a 38/38 works both barrels together while a 32/36 has a primary/secondary setup and each barrel comes online as more fuel/air is needed. Bottom line is that the 38/38 will give you a little more power if your engine is modified to need the additional air/fuel, but the 32/36 is going to give you fuel economy without any real sacrifice to power. I am running a pair of the 32/36s on my modified E3 and am pleased with the setup.

I'm looking for some suggestions on retro-fitting some carbs on my '73 E3. I understand the Weber 32/36 would fit with additional linkage. I would rather not change intake manifolds unless it was an easy swap. Would the Weber 38/38 work? What others would work and what benefits/draw backs are associated?
Thanks -John

there was a guy in Ohio that was selling a 3.0s about a year ago, it had the 40DCOE'S set up., he mentioned there were no "flat spots" and the car ran great, anyone run this setup with a 2500, 2800, Bavaria, or 3.0s?

Tim
'74 2002

Follow Ups:

Re: How about twin 40 DCOE'S?... andrey 18:08 12/02/2001 (5)
- Oops, my mistake, forgot he wanted to stay... Timmer 19:14 12/02/2001 (4)
  - hmm.... andrey 19:28 12/02/2001 (3)
    - The weber 38/38 is a nice choice.. Timmer 21:05 12/02/2001 (2)
      - I get about 12mpg right now : ) andrey 02:57 12/03/2001 (1)
        
        25mpg might be a little generous Andrey... Timmer 06:24 12/03/2001 (0)

[ Follow Ups ] [ Sr. Six (E3) Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]

Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.