The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
Although I agree to get a 6 over a 4 for the 5,I'l (archive)

[ Follow Ups ] [ 5-series (E34) Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]

Posted by ' also say your mech's an idiot(e) on June 12, 2000 at 13:52:01:

In Reply to: Re: your thoughts on the 1991 518i posted by James on June 12, 2000 at 07:33:24:

: : Hi there,

: : I'm currently considering coming over to the "dark side" and getting a bimmer - I've seen a reasonably priced used 518i, but I've been unable to find many in depth reviews on the car (I believe it was only available new in Europe - but I could be wrong)

: : Does anyone have any experience with this car? Things I should look out for etc. (an email copy would be nice too - but hey, beggars can't be choosers! :P)

: : Your expertise is appreciated!! :)

:
: The 518i is to be honest underpowered for this type of car - the 520/525 are a much better choice - having a straight six rather than a 4 cylinder makes a BIG difference. THe 520i is immeasurably different in response, and although does not have much low-end pull, is good at higher revs.

: My mechanic advised me that the 4 cylinder is far harder to fix, and nowhere near as reliable!

: Added to this the fact that the 6 cylinders are slightly more fuel efficient on the motorways, and that kinda sums it up!

:
: James
: 1995 520i M50TU

: PS - the post '91 (in the UK) versions of the 2.0/2.5 engines are far better in every respect.





Follow Ups:



[ Follow Ups ] [ 5-series (E34) Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2009 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.