|
In Reply to: Your opininon on rel. vs. performance please... posted by Adnan on July 09, 2000 at 14:50:43:
: 2. I understand that a moderately high-performance car will need more upkeep and have more complex systems that an average performer but if you pay that much more for the BMW, shouldn't you expect proportional quality and reliability? Should performance and reliability be mutually exclusive?
It is proportional - IMHO. It's just that certain things, no matter how expensive, have similar life spans because of their specific - I'll take a very silly but descriptive example here : wiper blades. You can get ones 10x more expensive than a different set and they will last just as long. Or light bulbs. Or brake pads. Of course, all these are silly examples (again) but I think they make a point.
Now - why would I compare a 10:1 3.5l engine that spends most of its lifetime between 3k and 5k rpm with a 2l 4 cyl that's being automatically upshifted at 3k rpm ? Why would I compare the suspension of a 2t car designed to be a little tight yet suple enough with one that has to be mushy even when new, supporting a car 1000lbs lighter ? I have all the confidence that BMWs in general are very reliable. They might make you work on them more often, but they do not get the same treatment as the mainstream sedans.
I don't get the Japanese cars myth that's going on on these shores, nor their huge following. A couple of years ago, in Europe the Japanese makers weren't doing great at all. Quite the opposite : bland cars, very expensive.. I was shocked when a friend of mine American told me the most reliable cars are Japanese.. At least back then, the general feeling about any Japanese product is that they were good until their first problem. sorry for the long post and please be tough : don't think for a second your E34 is not reliable. it is but we have to be reasonable in what to expect. best regards,
: 3. If any of you have owned other similar performance cars, how would you rate the E34 against those?
: 5. Incidentally, judging by the response I received, is mentioning a Japanese car a major faux pas on this board?
(It had to do with the fact that Japan has limited resources and they had to do as much as possible to as little as possible. Which led to very high hp/liter ratios - meaning a pretty stressed engine, or screws that were ment to be tightened once. I divagate.. sorry)
Here - they are pretty cost effective and the cost-aware Americans do not see any point in spending more for German irons that are 'less reliable'.. (and we hate them and they hate us and that's how we don't want to hear any h*nda/t*yota noises on our turf).
dragos