The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
Lots of assumptions here.. (archive)

[ Follow Ups ] [ M5 (E34) Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]

Posted by KJK on May 23, 2002 at 12:20:44:

In Reply to: Self-Leveling: Why not keep original system? posted by ///Slider on May 19, 2002 at 08:02:42:

I am not sure that BMW put the self-leveling in the M5 because it was the best option. Didn't it already exist in other cars? Car companies make decisions based on lots of things, not just what is the best peformance. Do you think our measley stock rotors are ideal for a 4000lb car?

With that said, I do think the self-leveling is a nice compromise for daily driving. I just couldn't bring myself to spend that kind of money for shock replacement, knowing that the pump can also fail. I also track my car and the stock suspension just doesn't cut it. In fact, even with Dinan springs the car doesn't have enough spring. I do think the stock suspension is best for high speed driving and the car was way less twitchy in stock form. However, turn in was just a fraction of what it is know in tighter corners.

Kevin
'91 M5 Dinan Stage III (except I have RD swaybars)

Gents,

I've scoured the archives here and elsewhere, and have seen a LOT of great dialogue concerning the self-leveling system, and ways of getting around the expense of replacing the stock factory setup.

I guess the one question that has remained with me is this: why wouldn't it be worth the effort and expense to just repair/replace the original setup? Obviously, costs seem to be a major factor here (if not THE major factor), but given that BMW went to the trouble of designing a system specifically for the E34 M5, wouldn't this still be the preferred setup? Is there a perception afield that the system has never really performed "as advertised"?

What am I missing? Will Bilsteins, et al. deliver superior performance -- or just comparable performance for a fraction of the price? Just how expensive IS it to replace the original system, anyway? (I'm a U.S. soldier in Germany working on a U.S. spec M5 which is currently at the "small leak" stage.) Lots of questions, I'm afraid, but this is one of those situations where a misstep would really compromise the car. TIA for any assistance.

///Slider





Follow Ups:



[ Follow Ups ] [ M5 (E34) Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2009 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.