The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
I believe M3EVO numbers are right (more) (archive)

[ Follow Ups ] [ M3 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]

Posted by ChasM3 on May 11, 1999 at 13:28:59:

In Reply to: wrong car... posted by Brad Franklin on May 11, 1999 at 11:14:27:

: : Very very close..the performance figures for both cars are identical..0-60 5.5sec and quarter mile in 14.0....depends on the driver.


: He's talking about a 2nd gen Turbo II, not a 3rd gen RX-7. If you're talking about E36 M3 vs. 2nd gen RX-7 turbo II, the M3 is far superior in both acceleration and handling (even though SOLO II classifies them both in A stock). The Turbo II is much cheaper though, and can be modified to be quite fast.

: Brad

5.5sec 0-60 is a 2nd gen..not a 3rd gen. I sold my 94 RX7 prior to buying my M3. 5.3sec 0-60 was the spec 0-60 time....I could get 5.2sec with a perfect launch, which was extremely difficult. Brad's right about mods....after mine was modified, it flew.




Follow Ups:



[ Follow Ups ] [ M3 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2017 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.