In Reply to: Here's a Jim Conforti email, doesn't it.... posted by steve m on April 30, 2000 at 17:04:29:
: It seems that the only further reprogramming that Jim Conforti should be allowed to partake in be that of his own attitude.
: At 01:12 PM 4/29/00 -0400, you wrote:
: What if there were no people who thought the way that I profess we should?
: we would all be driving stock BMW's, wouldn't we?
: Actually Steven.. if more people had thought that way.. and doubted me
: as do the vocal minority on Bimmer.Org.. I would have left this biz years
: Flash Memory programming would never have happened, and you'd only be
: able to get
: your soldered on chip from Dinan.
: What everyone fails to realize is that I'm driving this industry to a
: higher standard
: for everyone.. not for MY gain.. Dinan was soldering on chips.. I came
: out with flash
: programming and forced HIM to compete.. Six months later he was doing
: flash programming.
: I could go on and show you another 10 examples.. like the turbocharger
: company that
: was using additional injectors until I showed them a better way.. and on
: and on.
: As far as what you keep talking about on the boards.. shut up already because
: you really don't know what you are talking about.
: You're about to get yourself in the middle of a legal fight you don't even
: know exists.
: The EPA and CARB are well aware of what your "friends" are pulling.
: Disabling adaption is illegal. Period..
: If you do it as a tuner.. you will be fined/jailed eventually.
: It just takes time for the feds to catch up.
: They always do.