In Reply to: Goto b-p-g.com for a comparison (e) posted by UNVMYM3 on June 16, 2000 at 19:41:59:
"In Reply to: ECIS DEFINITELY!!!! posted by YO on June 14, 2000 at 17:52:56:
(posted from: python.cs.utah.edu (220.127.116.11))
Hey *****mz3.. do you have alternate identities or
just a split personality.. LOL.
As far as the BPG "test".. what they posted was
NOT the true result. Of course, if the clue
that the JimC Intake had 4-5 more lb/ft of torque
but somehow lost in HP wasn't a clue.. then maybe
it's time to drive a Taurus. What happened is
that intentionally or accidentally, the temp
sensor was fudged with to skew the correction
factors. I have the ACTUAL DYNO RUNS and anyone
who'd like to see them can.. just ask, and I
shall EMAIL them to you :) "
: : Anybody out there with comments on whether the ECIS or the Conforti is better on performance?
: : ECIS is a K & N cone with heat shield and goes for $199 on the Group Purchase noted elsewhere in the Message Board. Conforti intake is going for about $449 from TMS or Eurosport has a new ITG foam filter with heat shield. Both are suppose to be cold air intakes. But is there a big difference in performance? Or, the same?
: : Would I get better performance by matching the Conforti Shark Injector with the ECIS than with the ITG?