The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
Re: GTech comparisons (including png's 540iA) (archive)

[ Follow Ups ] [ M5 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]

Posted by Rick W on January 17, 2000 at 10:54:42:

In Reply to: Re: GTech comparisons (including png's 540iA) posted by Peter G. on January 17, 2000 at 01:14:38:

Thanks for cleaning up that table.

Anyway, I can't speak to the comparibility of one G-Tech to another which is really a question of the absolute accuracy of their units. I can attest to the presision and repeatability of numbers with any one G-Tech however.

Also note that, while these numbers seems slow, that is consistent with my feeling that I wasn't getting good launches. These same cars with this same G-Tech got significantly better times when I was on a stickier surface and the temperature was 40 degrees cooler.

Anyway, If you were getting 5.5 out of your stock auto 540i, then you either have a really strong car, or your G-tech is optimistic.

Regardless, I like the G-tech because it makes it easy to quantify improvements in technique or car modifications. This is a big help, for example, on my 240Z autocross car where I can tweak things like fuel mixture and spark timing.

Rick

:
: [ png: Let's see if I can't get this table to format right... ]
:


: : M5 540i M3
: : 0-60 5.1s 6.2s 6.2s
: : 1st 0.70g 0.57g 0.55g
: : 2nd 0.55g 0.42g 0.44g
: : 3rd 0.35g 0.28g 0.28g
:

: : (FYI, with cooler temps and better traction, I've gotten upper-mid 5 second times in both the 540 and M3 before)

: These measurements illustrate one of the weak links in the G-Tech story. I have a G-Tech Pro and a '99 540iA Sport with Dinan's cold-air intake, Stage II engine programming, and Steptronic transmission programming.

: Prior to all the mods, I was getting 5.48 and 5.49-second 0-60 readings essentially every time I did my part during the launch. (DSC off, A/C off, RPMs to about 1,500 with the brakes on, then release the brake and roll the power on just fast enough to produce a little bit of tire spin, but not too much.)

: With all the mods, I'm getting 5.30 to 5.33-second readings. Okay, great, it's just about as much faster as it ought to be given the relatively small amount of extra power added by the Dinan mods.

: But would another G-Tech produce the same results? That is, are G-Tech results repeatable, and therefore transferable, from one G-Tech to another?

: I expect that any recent 540i six-speed manual-transmission car ought to be faster than my car, regardless of the mods, but here we have evidence that my G-Tech is producing better results for my car than your G-Tech is for yours. This just isn't likely to be representative of reality.

: Hmm.

: . png




Follow Ups:



[ Follow Ups ] [ M5 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2017 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.