The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
Re: clk vs m5 (archive)
[ Follow Ups ] [ M5 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Posted by Brad Hemingson on July 16, 2001 at 09:18:10:

In Reply to: clk vs m5 posted by Duane on July 15, 2001 at 22:05:30:

I looked very closely at both cars before buying my M5. The facts as I saw them: No standard transmission, 50+/- less horsepower,useless back seat and overall lower performance numbers. If you like Mercedes (and I do) the CLK is a very pretty car. For comparison also look at the E55 and the S55 coupe.

I am getting rid of 2001 911 turbo for something more practical... I am very torn between the clk55 and the m5. I drove the m5 but I am yet to drive the clk55. Looking for some advice from someone has owned both cars or knows them both very well..




Follow Ups:


[ Follow Ups ] [ M5 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2008 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.