Re: If the XJR ranked 3rd vis-a-vis the M5 & E (archive)
[ Follow Ups ] [ M5 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Posted by Gavin on April 11, 2002 at 02:27:46:
In Reply to: If the XJR ranked 3rd vis-a-vis the M5 & E55, why posted by CP on April 05, 2002 at 21:15:49:
(posted from: cpe.atm2-0-111190.0xc2eff207.bynxx8.customer.tele.dk (194.239.242.7))
would the performance-version of Jaguar's lower-line car (which, as a vehicle platform, ranked poorly with comparable mid-line cars such as the 530i, audi, lexus, etc.) be able to stand toe-to-toe with the M5...just doesn't make sense...to me at least.
Because the platform used in the R has been changed beyond recognizion since the launching of the first S-type. The reason being, as you rightly point out, that the S-type was dynamically inferior to its competitors.
Gavin
Follow Ups:
[ Follow Ups ] [ M5 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]