The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
Not really. (m) (archive)
[ Follow Ups ] [ Wheel/Tire Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Posted by Eddie@Tirerack.com on September 06, 2000 at 18:25:38:

In Reply to: But Tirerack has faster lap times for AVS!(m) posted by Bill on September 06, 2000 at 15:09:39:

Agreed with Aaron. They drove really nice & are economical for a max perf. tire, but the wet traction is really where they stand out.

Your comment on the faster lap times is somewhat correct if you closely look at the times- S02s 31.59, AVSs 31.50 dry, but in the wet, S02s 31.65 vs. 32.62 for AVS.

Thanks!
Eddie
Retail sales 800.428.8355, ext 369
Bimmer.org E46/Audiworld.com Wheel/tire Forums Moderator
Personal Web: http://www.e46fanatics.com/eddie



It all really depends on how hard you are going to be driving the car. I had a set of AVS Sports on my 95 M3, but they were not up to the level of dry performance that the S-02's (the tire I'm currently using myself) have. The S-02 is also considerably better in the rain as well. If you would like to chat about ofhter differences, I'd be happy to. Let me know,
thanks
Aaron
800.428.8355 x395


In a test with the AVS Sports and S02PP, the test said that in the dry the AVS had better lap times. Comments?




Follow Ups:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Wheel/Tire Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2009 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.