Torn among RX300, X5 and ML320 (archive)

The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.

Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly

+ Bentley Forums

+ Cadillac Forums

+ Chevrolet Forums

+ Ferrari Forums

+ Jaguar Forums

+ Lamborghini Forums

+ Mercedes-Benz Forums

+ Maserati Forums

+ Porsche Forums

+ General Discussion

+ Marketplace Forums

Torn among RX300, X5 and ML320 (archive)

[ Follow Ups ] [ X5 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]

Posted by LarryZ on January 27, 2002 at 21:58:30:

(posted from: proxy1-external.westprt1.ky.home.com (24.4.253.126))

Lean towards X5 and RX300 for obviously higher standard building material and attention to details in the car. Is 02 X5 more reliable compared to 2000 and 2001 modles? I mean major problems such as stalling, electornic/electric problem. What is rpm for 3.0 X5 at 75mph. RX300 does it at almost 3000. It's high but it's got 4 speed auto.

X5 3.0 auto, RPM@2300-2400 @ 75 mph.... Kewl X5 00:47 1/28/2002 (0)
X5 is nicest of them all. Yes, '02 reliability dcmicro 00:21 1/28/2002 (0)
Drive all 3... Congrats on new X5!!!! X5alive 22:47 1/27/2002 (0)
Re: Torn among RX300, X5 and ML320 Imola Red M 22:22 1/27/2002 (0)
Re: Torn among RX300, X5 and ML320 LarryZ 22:04 1/27/2002 (3)
- Xenons must be factory, aftermarkets not the same dcmicro 00:20 1/28/2002 (0)
- Re: Torn among RX300, X5 and ML320 Me 23:03 1/27/2002 (1)
  - and if the RX is a minivan, i can't even describe whatever 23:09 1/27/2002 (0)

[ Follow Ups ] [ X5 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]

Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.

© 1997 - 2008 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.