The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
Re: 1.9 vs 2.8....................... (long reply) (archive)

[ Follow Ups ] [ Z3 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]

Posted by Cliff on February 10, 2000 at 09:15:56:

In Reply to: Re: 1.9 vs 2.8....................... (long reply) posted by bmv on February 09, 2000 at 14:49:52:

I've owned several roadsters and personally, power is not a big deal in a roadster for me. In a sedan, yes! But all this talk about driving 100 miles per hour is BS. Where I live, you go to jail for that. Furthermore, the joy of a roadster is cruising along at reasonable speeds with the top down. At 85 there is so much wind and wind noise that frankly, I don't enjoy it much. Sure, short bursts to that speed are fun, then it's back to reasonable driving. To me it seems pointless to put a powerful engine into a less than absolutely rigid car--drive a 328IS or M3 and you'll see. If you like lots of power, fine. For me, there are canoes and skis and bikes and wilderness trips, and great restaurants and theatre: I'll spend my extra dollars on those things and drive my slow 1.9. When cruising along at highway speeds I'll never know the difference, and in the twisties I'll have a ball shifting which, after all, is what true roadsters are all about. I had an MG-A and TR-3 once and I never complained about the power--just the rain that got in.


Follow Ups:



[ Follow Ups ] [ Z3 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2017 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.