The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
Reality check- (archive)

[ Follow Ups ] [ Z3 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]

Posted by JoeZaf on October 30, 2000 at 09:39:55:

In Reply to: Z3 VS ALFA 3.0 (1987) posted by Manny on October 29, 2000 at 12:45:05:

If you smoked a Z3 1.9 in your Alfa 3.0, I'm not that impressed. My 98 Z3 1.9 was a great handling car but with under 140HP and even less torque, there wasn't much out there that couldn't smoke it. As for the 2.5, 2.8, 3.0 and M roadsters, I think we both know that, unless the driver you faced was a complete jackass, there is absolutely no way you would beat him. All of the above cars post sub-7 0-60's. If I recall correctly, the Milano is probably closer to eight seconds. Even you must know that your victory is not consistent with what is commonly known about the performance characteristics of the Z3. Otherwise, you wouldn't be bragging. I mean, I don't post on the Dodge Caravan board every time I smoke a family of four.

P.S. No offense, I love italian cars- I've even owned a couple of Alfas, Lancias and a Fiat-
But Manny, think about it, I bet you I could smoke a Ferrari if he wasn't looking and once, my 2.5 got its ass kicked by a Dodge Neon because of my unwillingness to drop the hammer. Right now, there is a guy in a dodge neon bragging just like you and the funny thing is- neither of you have a clue as to why you won.


Follow Ups:



[ Follow Ups ] [ Z3 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2017 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.