The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
Re: 2001 2.5 vs. 3.0 (archive)
[ Follow Ups ] [ Z3 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Posted by Stephen on March 12, 2001 at 00:38:21:

In Reply to: 2001 2.5 vs. 3.0 posted by Ari on March 11, 2001 at 23:07:23:

Its purely a personal choice and a matter of how far you are willing to go. I purchased my Y2K Z3 2.3 (w/2.5l) in the first part of January this year in Western Canada. Sure, its last year's model but I do believe I saved a lot (14% off list price) otherwise I wouldn't be able to get into a Z3. It's the base model with minimal options, but not everybody can tell the difference when its parked on the street. I am happy with it.

So, be happy with the decision you have made. Some people will say that you should have gone for the M-Roadster, others will say should go for the 3.0 while some will say you should stay with the bare bone 2.5. They all have good reasons, but only yours count. Good luck!

Follow Ups:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Z3 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2009 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.