The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
Zaino Site long on jargon, short on science (archive)

[ Follow Ups ] [ Z3 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]

Posted by FWK-Z3 on April 17, 2001 at 22:20:27:

In Reply to: Zaino's IS better - an objective test posted by BHT on April 15, 2001 at 21:48:50:

First, I have worked 22 years in semiconductor surface preparation, and every time I read something on the Zaino website, I come away with a queasy feeling. I will stick with Zymol because I understand how it works and there are just too many errors in Zaino's advertising for my taste.

Z2 is made for clear-coated finishes, yet they talk about it "bonding with the pigment". Guess what, there is no pigment in clear coat - that's why it is clear.

Zaino makes claims of "molecular bonding". the only bonding between molecules short of chemical reactions I know about is solvation or plasticizing, and I certianly wouldn't putting solvents and plasticizers for the paint on any car. Although they would cause the paint to swell and hide small scratches that diffract light to give a shiny "wet" finish. However what may look good would really be very bad for your paint.

I have seen references to "99.99% optically perfect" Whatr does this mean?

Note that Zaino always talks about "show cars". This should be a clue as to how much protection it provides. The real reason to wax a car is to render its surface hydrophobic, so that water cannot get in and cause corrosion.


Follow Ups:



[ Follow Ups ] [ Z3 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2009 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.