The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
Re: Z3 vs. S2000. Anyone driven both? (archive)
[ Follow Ups ] [ Z3 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Posted by danez3 on April 29, 2001 at 21:44:42:

In Reply to: Z3 vs. S2000. Anyone driven both? posted by Paul on April 29, 2001 at 15:45:41:

the s2k is an alright car.. higher rmps doesn't mean more wear for that car.. it is a vtec and as such, was designed for the higher rpms.. (goes to 9000) they didn't make it that high for the fun of it. The s2k as everyone knows is the new kid on the block.. it is very very good in some aspects and lacking in others like all cars.. it looks alright.. very honda-ish.. but if u drive it correctly (like u just robbed a bank) u can get performace from it, like no other. Me personally.. right now i own a 2.8 z3.. i am digging the s2k alot.. it's new.. it gets 240 hp from a four pot (little ass torque though) but that's how honda does performance, and i'm not knockin them, they are good at what they do. But for the current costs of them.. i would go with a performance version of the roadsters.. get an 2001 M roadster for the price.. the new ones are the baddest boys when it comes to convertibles right now (normal roadsters in it's class, not ferrari's and lambo's)
DMW

Follow Ups:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Z3 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2009 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.